Are Nobel price winners in Physics also "Physics Flunk outs"?

I think the physics is clear. It reveals that CO2 doesn't significantly warm the planet. CO2 absorbs a small fraction of the spectrum of infrared from the warming earth. Most of that IR goes back to space. That tiny fraction that CO2 can absorb is mostly absorbed by the available CO2. Addition of more CO2 lowers that ceiling and has diminishing returns. That is the actual physics. They attempt to create other feedback mechanism to try and put some fangs on CO2. The computer modelers trying to mage their programs to show it causes warming have failed. The predictions of those that pretend it drives the global climate have fallen short, yet the believers are not dissuaded from their quest. Clearly it has become a new religion (or an offshoot of an old one). I think it is easy for us skeptics to see this behavior in the alarmists. They simply need to open their eyes and look deeply into the mirror if they want to actually see the truth that AGW is largely a myth.